Characteristics and 1-year outcomes of patients with rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) are associated typically with a large sac diameter; however, some patients experience rupture before reaching operative thresholds for elective repair. We aim to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients who experience small rAAA. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative database for open AAA repair and endovascular aneurysm repair from 2003 to 2020 were reviewed for all rAAA cases. Based on the 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines on operative size thresholds for elective repair, patients with infrarenal aneurysms of less than 5.0 cm in women or less than 5.5 cm in men were categorized as a small rAAA. Patients who met operative thresholds or had a concomitant iliac diameter 3.5 cm or greater were categorized as a large rAAA. Patient characteristics and perioperative as well as long-term outcomes were compared via univariate regression. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was used to examine the relationship between rAAA size and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: There were 3962 cases that met inclusion criteria, with 12.2% small rAAA. The mean aneurysm diameter was 42.3 mm and 78.5 mm in the small and large rAAA groups, respectively. Patients in the small rAAA group were significantly more likely to be younger, African American, have a lower body mass index, and had significantly higher rates of hypertension. Small rAAA were more likely to be repaired via endovascular aneurysm repair (P = .001). Hypotension was significantly less likely in patients with small rAAA (P<.001). Rates of perioperative myocardial infarction (P < .001), total morbidity (P < .004) and mortality (P < .001) were significantly higher for large rAAA cases. After propensity matching, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups, but smaller rAAA was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.82). On long-term follow-up, no difference in mortality was noted between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with small rAAA represent 12.2% of all rAAA and are more likely to be African American. Small rAAA is associated with similar risk of perioperative and long-term mortality compared with rupture at larger size after risk adjustment.

The Contemporary Impact of Body Mass Index on Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has deemed obesity a national epidemic and contributor to other leading causes of death including heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. Accordingly, the role of body mass index (BMI) and its impact on surgical outcomes has been a focus of persistent investigation. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of BMI on open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (oAAA) outcomes in contemporary practice. METHODS: All elective oAAAs in the VQI (2010-2021) were identified. End-points included 30-day death, in-hospital complications and 1-year mortality. Patients were stratified into four BMI cohorts (BMI<18.5, 18.5≤BMI<25, 25≤BMI<30, BMI≥30). Spline interpolation was used to explore a potential non-linear association between BMI and perioperative mortality. Mixed-effects Cox regression was used to assess the association between BMI and 1-year survival. RESULTS: 9,479 patients underwent oAAA over the study interval (median age-70, 74%-male, BMI 27±6). Lower BMI patients(<18.5) compared to higher BMI(>30) patients were more likely to be women (53% vs. 32%;p<.0001), current smokers(65% vs. 50%;p<.0001), and have COPD(58% vs. 37%;p<.0001). In contrast, an increased BMI was associated with a greater prevalence of diabetes and CAD (DM-26% vs. 6%;p<.0001; CAD-27% vs. 20%;p=.01). There was no difference in cross-clamp position or visceral/renal bypass between groups, though low BMI patients necessitated more frequent infrainguinal bypass(5% vs. 2%;p=.0002). 30-day mortality and in-hospital complications were greater among low BMI patients(30-day mortality:12% vs. 4%;p<.0001;complications-47% vs. 37%;p<.0001). Interestingly, low BMI conferred a nearly 2-fold increase in observed pulmonary complications(18% vs. 11%;p<.0001). Surgical site infections were twice as common among the lowest and highest BMI groups(4% vs. 2%;p<.0001). 1-year mortality was greatest among low BMI patients(23% vs. 9%;p<.0001). Adjusted spline-fit analysis demonstrated increased mortality among patients with BMI<21 or >34(BMI<18.5-HR 2.1, 95%CI 1.6-2.8;p<.0001; BMI>34-HR 1.3, 95%CI 1.1-1.6;p=.009). CONCLUSION: Both low (<18.5) and high (>34) BMI were associated with increased oAAA mortality in current practice. Despite the perception that obesity confers substantial surgical risk during oAAA, diminished BMI was associated with a 3-fold increase in 30-day and 1-year mortality. It appears that BMI extremes are distinct proxies for differential clinical phenotypes and should inform risk stratification for oAAA repair.

A rare presentation and management of thrombosis of an aberrant right subclavian artery related to thoracic outlet syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: We present a case in which a 44-year-old female smoker with a complex medical and surgical history presented with acute upper limb ischemia. METHODS: The patient was diagnosed with thoracic outlet syndrome causing symptomatic thrombosis of an aberrant right subclavian artery associated with diverticulum of Kommerell. The patient had history of extensive surgeries and radiation in the right chest with fibrotic changes, so surgical dissection in the area was associated with significant risk of nerve injury. Therefore, revascularization of the arm was performed via carotid to brachial artery bypass with reversed saphenous vein and the thoracic outlet was decompressed with segmental clavicular resection. RESULTS: Patient has been symptom free for 3 years with patent bypass. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates a unique presentation of distal thrombosis of a symptomatic aberrant right subclavian artery related to thoracic outlet syndrome. The combined claviculectomy-vein bypass is a safe and efficacious surgical approach that provides durable relief.

Superselective intranidal delivery of platinum-based high-density packing coils for treatment of arteriovenous malformations.

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) classically feature an intervening nidus of poorly differentiated endothelium. The pillar of modern AVM treatment is intranidal delivery and deposition of various liquid embolic agents such as n-butyl cyanoacrylate, ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer, and ethanol. These agents are cumbersome to prepare, deliver, and deploy and have been associated with complications related to limited delivery control, nonretrievability, frequent microcatheter exchanges, and nontarget embolization. Coils and other proximal occlusive agents have not been traditionally recommended as sole embolic agents for AVM treatment given the inherent lack of adequate AVM nidus penetration with previous coil technologies. In the present report, we have described a series of three patients with AVMs in whom newer generation, platinum-based, packing coils were used safely and effectively as the primary agent for superselective nidal penetration and embolization.

Superselective carotid body tumor embolization with platinum-based coils.

Resection of Shamblin II and III carotid body tumors can be challenging owing to the potential for significant blood loss. Prophylactic use of liquid embolic agents poses a risk of inflammatory reactions and nontarget embolization. On the other hand, coil embolization has traditionally been limited to cases involving external carotid artery sacrifice. Herein we demonstrate that superselective targeting of tumor-feeding vessels using platinum based, fully detachable packing coils is effective at sustained devascularization of Shamblin II and III carotid body tumors without subsequent inflammation, allowing for a longer interval between embolization and tumor resection, and potentially reducing blood loss without need for ligation or reconstruction of the internal or external carotid artery.

Endovascular repair of a dissecting pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with type III Loeys-Dietz syndrome.

Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) type 3 results from a SMAD3 mutation and is a phenotypically milder variant of LDS with frequent aortic, visceral, and cerebral vascular pathologies and osteoarthritis. Historically, endovascular treatment (endovascular aortic repair [EVAR]) of LDS-related aortic aneurysmal disease with traditional modular bifurcated devices has been limited owing to concerns regarding continued aortic dilation at proximal fixation sites. Furthermore, associated dissection pathology has also precluded traditional modular bifurcated EVAR owing to inadequate proximal infrarenal necks and narrow distal aortic domains leading to compromised contralateral gate opening and cannulation as well as limb flow compromise. To address these barriers to EVAR, we present our approach for the endovascular treatment of a dissecting pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm using an anatomically fixated, bifurcated, unibody aortic stent graft in a patient with LDS-3.

Retroperitoneal Approach for Excision of Wear-Debris Pseudotumor: A Case Report.

CASE: Pelvic pseudotumors may occur as a reaction to wear-debris after hip arthroplasty and are rarely treated with surgery. We describe an instance in which a pelvic pseudotumor along the iliopsoas muscle tendon sheath was debulked using a retroperitoneal approach in a patient presenting for treatment of a prosthetic hip infection. The patient recovered uneventfully and was ambulatory with a new hip prosthesis at 3 months after procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal exposure provided safe, excellent exposure to a wear-debris pelvic pseudotumor in this case.

Characteristics and outcomes of small abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

OBJECTIVE: The current guidelines recommend elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair at 5.5 cm for men and 5.0 cm for women. However, rupture can occur in patients with an aneurysm smaller than these size thresholds. In the present study, we investigated the proportion of AAAs that rupture at sizes less than elective operative thresholds and compared the outcomes of repair with those of aneurysms that had ruptured at a larger size. Our hypothesis was that the rupture of small AAAs carries mortality similar to that of rupture at larger sizes. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular files for open AAA repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) were reviewed for all cases of ruptured AAAs (rAAAs) from 2011 to 2018. The patients were divided into two groups: those with small AAAs that had ruptured at a size less than the current size guidelines for elective repair and those with large AAAs that had ruptured at a size that had met the criteria for elective repair. Univariate analyses were conducted to compare the comorbidities and perioperative outcomes of infrarenal rAAA repair between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the differences in mortality between small and large rAAAs after controlling for confounding variables. RESULTS: Of the 1612 rAAA repairs, 167 (10.4%) were small rAAAs. The proportion of small rAAAs did not significantly change during the study period (P = .15). The large rAAA group was more likely to have juxtarenal or suprarenal aneurysms compared with the small rAAA group (27% vs 16%; P = .001). A comparison of infrarenal rAAAs only demonstrated that the mean small rAAA (n = 141) diameter was 4.1 cm in the women and 4.5 cm in the men compared with the large rAAAs (n = 1051), with a mean diameter of 7.1 cm in women and 8.3 cm in men (P < .01 for the women; P < .01 for the men). The patients in the small rAAA group had had a significantly lower body mass index but were more likely to be African American and to have hypertension. The small rAAA group was more likely to present without hypotension and to have undergone EVAR. The repair of small rAAAs was associated with lower bleeding and mortality and a shorter mean operative time but with more readmissions. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that size was not associated with outcome after adjusting for other variables. CONCLUSIONS: Of all AAA repairs classified as treating rupture, 10% were for patients with small AAAs. Patients with small rAAA were less likely to present with hypotension and were more likely to have undergone EVAR. Further research into sac morphology and more sensitive imaging modalities might help identify small rAAAs at high risk of rupture that would benefit from elective repair.

Trends and outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with open concomitant cervical debranching.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the most common surgical procedure for treatment of descending thoracic aortic pathology. Cervical debranching in the form of carotid-subclavian bypass or transposition (CSBT) and carotid-carotid bypass (CCB) has enabled the use of TEVAR for the treatment of more complex anatomy involving the arch. The present study examined the effects of concomitant cervical bypass on the perioperative outcomes of TEVAR. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program files (2005-2017) were reviewed. Using the Current Procedural Terminology codes, all patients who had undergone TEVAR were identified and were divided into three groups: TEVAR, TEVAR with one bypass (CSBT or CCB), and TEVAR with two bypasses (CSBT and CCB). The patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes of the three groups were compared. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: A total of 3281 patients had undergone TEVAR and 10% had also undergone one or more debranching procedure (one bypass, 9%; two bypasses, 1%). The frequency of debranching had increased from 3.4% to 10.9% (P = .01) during the study period. Significant differences were found among the three groups in age, sex, smoking history, urgency of surgery, and anesthesia technique. The patients who had undergone TEVAR with cervical debranching had had significantly greater morbidity, longer operating times, and longer hospital stays compared with those who had undergone TEVAR alone. The mortality of TEVAR with two bypasses (22.6%) was significantly greater than that of TEVAR alone (7.5%) and TEVAR with one bypass (6.8%; P < .01). The total morbidity (30.9% vs 35.1% vs 67.7%; P < .001) and stroke rate (3% vs 7.5% vs 12.9%; P < .0001) increased with the increasing number of bypasses. A subgroup analysis of patients who had undergone TEVAR with one bypass showed no significant differences in mortality between TEVAR plus CSBT (6.6%) vs TEVAR plus CCB (8.8%; P = .63). Multivariable analysis showed that TEVAR with two bypasses was associated with significantly increased mortality compared with TEVAR alone (odds ratio [OR], 4.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-10.73) and TEVAR with one bypass (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.24-9.51). Older age (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.42-2.13), dependent functional status (OR, 1.48; 1.00-2.19), dialysis (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.57-4.33), and emergent status (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.73-4.90) were also associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR with concomitant cervical debranching has been increasingly used to treat complex aortic pathology but is associated with significantly worse outcomes than TEVAR alone. As advanced endovascular technology to treat the aortic arch emerges, the outcomes of open surgical debranching in the present study constitute an important benchmark for comparison.

Endograft type and anesthesia mode are associated with mortality of endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair has become the primary treatment modality for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. This study examines the impact of endograft type on perioperative outcomes for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. METHOD: The targeted endovascular aneurysm repair files of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2012-2017) were used. Only patients treated for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were included. All patients requiring concomitant stenting of the visceral arteries or aneurysmal iliac arteries or open abdominal surgery were excluded. The characteristics of patients treated with the different endografts and the corresponding outcomes were compared using Stata software. RESULTS: There were 479 patients treated with the three most common endografts: Cook Zenith (n = 127), Gore Excluder (n = 239), and Medtronic Endurant (n = 113). The number of other endografts was too small for statistical analysis. Compared to patients treated with Excluder or Endurant, the patients treated with Zenith had significantly lower body mass index (P < .001) and were less likely to be white (P < .001). On the other hand, patients treated with Endurant were less likely to be smoker (P = .016). Patients treated with Zenith had significantly larger ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter (P = .045). The overall mortality was 18% and morbidity 74.3%. There was a statistically significant difference in overall mortality (Zenith = 11.8%, Excluder = 18%, Endurant = 24.8%, P = .033) but not morbidity (P = .808) between the three groups. Post hoc analysis for overall mortality showed only significant difference between Zenith and Endurant. The difference in mortality was not significant in patients presenting with ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm without hypotension (P = .065). On multivariable analysis, treatment with the Endurant endograft was associated with increased mortality compared to Zenith (odds ratio = 3.0 [confidence interval 1.31-6.7]). General anesthesia (odds ratio = 2.67 [confidence interval 1.02-7.02]), rupture with hypotension (odds ratio = 4.49 [confidence interval 2.54-7.95]), and dependent functional status (odds ratio = 5.7 [confidence interval 1.96-16.59]) were independently associated with increased mortality while increasing body mass index (odds ratio = 0.97 [confidence interval 0.95-0.99]) was associated with reduced risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights contemporary outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with relatively low mortality. Endograft type and anesthesia technique are modifiable factors that can potentially improve outcomes. Significant variation in the outcomes of the different endografts warrants further research.

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a centenarian.

As the general population ages, there will be an increasing number of vascular patients in their 90s and older. However, geriatric patients have historically been turned down for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair despite high aneurysm-related mortality in the unrepaired. Herein, we describe the perioperative considerations and the successful, uncomplicated operative course of a 100-year-old woman who underwent an elective endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for an expanding 5.3-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm. Given a suitable patient, there is acceptable risk profile of an endovascular approach, even in centenarians.

Dialysis is an independent risk factor for perioperative adverse events, readmission, reoperation, and mortality for patients undergoing elective spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The prevalence of dialysis-dependent patients in the United States is growing. Prior studies evaluating the risk of perioperative adverse events for dialysis-dependent patients are either institutional cohort studies limited by patient numbers or administrative database studies limited to inpatient data. PURPOSE: The present study uses a large, national sample with 30-day follow-up to investigate dialysis as risk factor for perioperative complications independent of patient demographics or comorbidities. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing elective spine surgery with or without dialysis from the 2005-2015 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative complications within 30 days and binomial reoperation, readmission, and mortality within 30 days were determined. METHODS: The 2005-2015 NSQIP databases were queried for adult dialysis-dependent and dialysis-independent patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. Differences in 30-day outcomes were compared using risk-adjusted multivariate regression and coarsened exact matching analysis for adverse events, unplanned readmission, reoperation, and mortality. The percentage of complications occurring before versus after hospital discharge was also assessed. The authors have no financial disclosures related to the present study. RESULTS: A total of 467 dialysis and 173,311 non-dialysis patients met the inclusion criteria. Controlling for age, gender, body mass index, functional status, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, dialysis patients were found to be at significantly greater odds of any adverse event (odds ratio [OR]=2.52 before, 2.17 after matching, p=<.001), major adverse event (OR=2.90 before, 2.52 after matching, p=<.001), and minor adverse event (OR=1.50 before matching, p=<.025, but not significantly different after matching). Further, dialysis patients were significantly more likely to return to the operating room (OR=2.77 before, 2.50 after matching, p=<.001), have unplanned readmissions (OR=2.73 before, 2.37 after matching, p=<.001), and die within 30 days (OR=3.77 before, 2.71 after matching, p=<.001). Adverse events occurred after discharge for 51.78% of non-dialysis patients and for 43.80% of dialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis patients undergoing elective spine surgery are at significantly higher risk of aggregated adverse outcomes, return to the operating room, readmission, and death than non-dialysis patients, even after controlling for patient demographics and overall health (as indicated by ASA class). These differences need to be considered when determining treatment options. Additionally, with bundled payments expected in spine surgery, physicians and hospitals need to account for increased costs and liabilities when working with dialysis patients.

Dialysis Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty Have Significantly Increased Odds of Perioperative Adverse Events Independent of Demographic and Comorbidity Factors.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of dialysis-dependent patients is growing, and an increasing number of these patients are being considered for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Studies assessing the preoperative risk associated with TKA in this population are limited to institutional cohorts with small sample sizes or national inpatient databases that lack follow-up data. METHODS: The 2006-2015 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases were queried for adult patients undergoing elective TKA. Differences in 30-day any/severe/minor adverse event, need for reoperation, readmission, and mortality were compared for dialysis-dependent and nondialysis TKA patients using risk-adjusted logistic regression. To account for the smaller number of dialysis patients and variations in study populations, coarsened exact matching was used. The proportion of adverse events that occurred before vs after discharge was also assessed. RESULTS: In total, 250 dialysis-dependent patients and 163,560 nondialysis patients met inclusion criteria. After controlling for patient demographics (age, sex, body mass index, functional status) and overall health (American Society of Anesthesiologists class), matched analysis revealed dialysis-dependent patients to be significantly more likely to experience any adverse event (odds ratio = 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-3.02; P = .001), severe adverse event (odds ratio = 2.49; 95% CI, 1.61-3.84; P < .001), reoperation (odds ratio = 2.38; 95% CI, 1.19-4.75; P = .014), readmission (odds ratio = 2.32; 95% CI, 1.47-3.66; P = .001), and mortality (odds ratio = 6.71; 95% CI, 2.99-22.50; P = .002). The majority of adverse outcomes occurred postdischarge. CONCLUSION: Independent of patient demographics and overall health (American Society of Anesthesiologists), patients undergoing dialysis before TKA are significantly more likely to experience 30-day adverse outcomes than matched nondialysis cohorts. Preoperative evaluation of bone health status and management of medical treatment are warranted in this fragile population. Cautious surgical planning, patient counseling, and heightened surveillance are necessitated throughout their perioperative period and postoperative recovery plans may need to be different from nondialysis counterparts. Furthermore, hospitals and physicians must take these increased risks into account when working on bundle payment reimbursement strategies and resource allocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.